Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 307
WRIGHT v. BROWN et al
as 5:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: WALTER LEE WRIGHT
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER P GOLDEN and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARGILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Defendant: BROWN, GABBY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff: QUINCETTA Y CARGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KROFT v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00324
Defendant: BURKE, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff: JIMMY LEE KROFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. BROWN
as 4:2024cv00314
Defendant: MR BROWN
Plaintiff: ROBERT L WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00289
Defendant: RICKY DIXON, ROBERT GOULD, BROWN and others
Plaintiff: JESSE ALAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. PUGH et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Defendant: YOUNG, JONES, CARRIER and others
Plaintiff: TREVON DEJAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00115
Defendant: JOHN BUTLER and ELIAS FOSKEY
Plaintiff: DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00221
Defendant: TIMOTHY NOLES, TOMMY DICKS, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff: JESSE ALAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant: THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAMBLES v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant: J BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?