Cases 1 - 10 of 34
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTOPHE v. SASSER et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHE ILMART and ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant:
DR SASSER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERNANDEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DR JOHNSON, RICKY DIXON, ARMOR CONTRACTED BY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE MONTALVO v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
HECTOR ADOLFO DE MONTALVO
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DR JAMIE LEACOCK, DR DANNY MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHILES v. LEE et al
as 4:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LEE RHILES, JR
Defendant:
MR LEE, DR CORTEZ, WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORDQUIST v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOSEPH NORDQUIST
Defendant:
DR VICTORIA LAWSON and DR RASHIK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
KIRK ANTHONY BENNETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DR PISTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. SAMMIS et al
as 3:2023cv21819
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
SAMMIS, M LOWE, CATNOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. BARTON et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
