Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 91 - 100 of 429,501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANSON v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: DAVID K MANSON
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SEC'Y CASE MANAGEMENT ELECTRONIC CASE FILES NO 1
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant: SEC'Y CASE MANAGEMENT ELECTRONIC CASE FILES NO 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NESBITT v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: edward nesbitt
Defendant: Deonidre Johnson and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
WILLIAMS v. HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00271
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERNINI et al v. CIRCLE K STORES INC
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: KATHERINE PERNINI and RICHARD PERNINI
Defendant: CIRCLE K STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HYDE v. ADKINSON et al
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant: MICHAEL A ADKINSON JR and JOHN LYONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRIHIM v. LANGLEY
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner: SIRAJ IBRIHIM
Respondent: J LANGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BROOKINS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00223
Petitioner: ELIJAH JABBER BROOKINS
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?