Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
DONALD L HARRISON
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and J E PRANTNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39271
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL J E HUMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAKE v. J & E TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 4:2021cv00029
Defendant:
ROBERT BRYAN THOMPSON and J & E TRUCKING SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
TAMEKA NICOLE LAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. J & E TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 4:2021cv00028
Defendant:
ROBERT BRYAN THOMPSON and J & E TRUCKING SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ MARIA BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78015
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. E. PETERSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
as 3:2019cv04973
Defendant:
J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS v. TOWNSEND et al
as 4:2018cv00422
Defendant:
J E FEAD, R OLIVER, J P ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. JONES et al.
as 3:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE TERRY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, J COKER, BOOKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
