Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
SUNTRUST BANK v. DAYNE ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
SUNTRUST BANK
Defendant:
DAYNE ENTERPRISES LLC, PREMIER MEDICAL CLINIC INC, PREMIER MEDICAL PEDIATRICS CLINIC INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. SUNTRUST BANK
as 4:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN COX
Defendant:
SUNTRUST BANK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
ALTIER et al v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E ALTIER and JODELL M ALTIER
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , SUNTRUST BANK NA , SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF SUNTRUST BANK ACCOUNT NO 1000142170694 IN NAME OF WOODSTOCK MARY ESTHER INC
as 3:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CONTENTS OF SUNTRUST BANK ACCOUNT NO 1000142170694 IN NAME OF WOODSTOCK MARY ESTHER INC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
