Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS INC, et al
as 3:2023cv16856
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PLOOM INC, ALTRIA GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
v. WALMART INC et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Defendant:
WALMART INC and Donald Nickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NICKSON v. WALMART INC
as 5:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
donald nickson
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SIPPLE v. WALMART INC
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
LIBBY DOZIER SIPPLE
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
McCARTNEY v. MYERS INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 3:2023cv07038
Plaintiff:
NAN MORGAN McCARTNEY
Defendant:
MYERS INDUSTRIES, INC., SCEPTER US HOLDING COMPANY, SCEPTER MANUFACTURING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BARGER v. WALMART INC et al
as 5:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
STEVE BARGER
Defendant:
Kent International, Inc., Walmart, Inc., WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
RUSSELL v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv05320
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSELL
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, AARON GOLEMAN, WALMART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WALMART INC
as 3:2022cv02218
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Smith
Defendant:
WALMART CORPORATION and WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
STROZIER v. WALMART INC et al
as 1:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY STROZIER
Defendant:
WALMART INC and APEX MEDICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
