Cases 51 - 60 of 2,735
Sevilla v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd
as 1:2011cv22156
Plaintiff:
Danilo Sevilla
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Banks v. South Florida Reception Center - Medical Department Officials et al
as 1:2011cv22166
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Banks
Defendant:
South Florida Reception Center - Medical Department Officials, Balmir, Chief of Physicians of South Florida Reception Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardona v. Touma et al
as 1:2011cv22153
Plaintiff:
Marta Luz Mancia Cardona
Defendant:
Michael Touma and Touma Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv22140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. 898017724743 and 898017724730
as 1:2011cv22134
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
898017724743 and 898017724730
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0781
Stiglich v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
as 1:2011cv22123
Plaintiff:
Carrie Stiglich
Defendant:
Bankers Life and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bottega Veneta International, S.A.R.L. v. Zhou et al
as 1:2011cv22131
Plaintiff:
Bottega Veneta International, S.A.R.L.
Defendant:
Ting Zhou, Yuan Yuan Zhang, Xiaomin Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv22113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Padilla et al v. Ernesli Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv22107
Plaintiff:
Eldin Y Padilla and Gerardo Cardona
Defendant:
Ernesli Corporation and Ernesto Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
De Conde v. Southern Florida Pain & Rehabilitation Center Corp, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv22091
Plaintiff:
Miraise De Conde
Defendant:
Southern Florida Pain & Rehabilitation Center Corp, Inc. and Premier Pain Care, P.L.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
