Cases 21 - 30 of 550
Cadejuste v. City of Ft. Pierce et al
as 2:2023cv14274
Plaintiff:
Marco Thony Cadejuste
Defendant:
City of Ft. Pierce, County of St. Lucie, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Senecharles v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv23173
Plaintiff:
Leslye Senecharles
Defendant:
State of Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis, Jill Casey DeSantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lubin v. United States of America
as 9:2023cv81001
Plaintiff:
David Lubin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Estinfil v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Whendid Estinfil
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Miami-Dade County, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Stephens et al
as 1:2023cv21987
Plaintiff:
David Coleman
Defendant:
Sgt. Stephens, Sgt. Carter, Sgt. Gwen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Posta v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv60656
Plaintiff:
David John Posta
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Swearingen et al
as 4:2023cv10020
Plaintiff:
Christopher Valdez
Defendant:
Richard Swearingen, David Quigley, Daniel Chu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Warden, Miami FCI
as 0:2023cv60528
Plaintiff:
David Pearson
Defendant:
Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ash v. JPay
as 1:2023cv21081
Plaintiff:
David Leon Ash, III
Defendant:
JPay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
