Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MacDonald v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
as 1:2015cv20912
Plaintiff:
Barbara MacDonald
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell v. Fort Lauderdale Airport Task Force et al
as 0:2015cv60050
Plaintiff:
Calvin C. Caldwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Fort Lauderdale Airport Task Force, Drug Enforcement Agency, Phil Macdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Savoie v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2013cv80517
Plaintiff:
Roswitha Ann Savoie
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw, Jerome Golden Ctr., Artola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Macdonald v. A1 Duran Roofing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv22039
Plaintiff:
Archivaldo Macdonald
Defendant:
A1 Duran Roofing, Inc. , ROBERTS ROOFING & SIDING, INC., and Bernardo Duran
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Duvercy v. Safari, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv62254
Plaintiff:
Enode Duvercy
Defendant:
Safari, Inc. and Seth MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Duvercy v. Safari, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv62150
Plaintiff:
Otesse Duvercy
Defendant:
Safari, Inc. and Seth MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
QA3 Financial Corp. v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv23452
Plaintiff:
QA3 Financial Corp.
Defendant:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Nohemy Sokolsky, Arthur Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Regions Bank v. M/V Independence et al
as 0:2010cv61056
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
M/V Independence and John L. MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MacDonald v. Diamond et al
as 0:2010cv60907
Plaintiff:
David MacDonald
Defendant:
Gerald Diamond and Joseph Diamond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rice et al v. G & G Marine, Inc.
as 0:2010cv60107
Plaintiff:
Macdonald Rice, Macdonald Rice, Patricia Rice and others
Defendant:
G & G Marine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
