Cases 51 - 60 of 178
Herrera v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv22555
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Jorge Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curtis v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv21243
Plaintiff:
Leighton Martin Curtis
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Diaz and Jamie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brestle v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2017cv80403
Plaintiff:
Gary Charles Brestle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bates v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv20966
Plaintiff:
Avinie Maurice Bates, III
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curtis v. US Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv20462
Plaintiff:
Leighton Martin Curtis
Defendant:
US Bureau of Prisons and Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fertilien v. US Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2016cv62721
Plaintiff:
Anel Fertilien
Defendant:
US Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2016cv24502
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prison , Thomas R. Kane, H.J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brestle v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons,
as 9:2016cv81808
Plaintiff:
Gary Charles Brestle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aiken v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2016cv24150
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Aiken
Defendant:
United States Of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leger v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2016cv23921
Plaintiff:
Paul Gerald Leger
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
