Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Simon v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 9:2010cv80668
Plaintiff:
Islande Simon
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv61759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyadjian v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2008cv61208
Plaintiff:
Antranik Boyadjian and Antranik Boyadjian
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv20318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2007cv80156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disabled Advocates, et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2003cv22407
Plaintiff:
Disabled Advocates and Counseling Group, Inc. and Steven Brother
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shotz, et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2002cv60691
Plaintiff:
Frederick Shotz, Lorraine Lanes, Dana Lamb and others
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Association Disabled, et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2002cv21465
Plaintiff:
Association For Disabled Americans, Inc., Archivist Daniel Ruiz and Jorge Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Access for Disabled v. 7 Eleven, Inc., et al
as 0:2002cv60657
Defendant:
7 Eleven, Inc. and Southland Corporation
Plaintiff:
Access for the Disabled, Inc. and Robert Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Access for Disabled, et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2002cv60078
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. and Southland Corporation, The
Plaintiff:
Access for the Disabled, Inc. and Rose M. Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
