Cases 41 - 50 of 1,077
BEY v. KEMP et al
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY Secured Party doing business as GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, TYRONE OLIVER and JENNIFER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. WHITE et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
BAVARIOUS KEJUAN NELSON
Defendant:
JAYLEN WHITE, MARCUS WILLIAMS, MARIO WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CORNEILUS WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTENBURG v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Warden SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. JOHN DOE et al
as 7:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Warden BEASLEY, Deputy Warden MARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWELL v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEWELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DARREN MYERS, LT WILLIAMS, P/A BRADFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
