Cases 91 - 100 of 1,610
BOYD et al v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Dawn Boyd and Celeste Collier
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, Mark P Jones and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN K FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA and SHERIFF DARREN MITCHUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYS v. STEEDLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and CHAPLAIN ALEXANDER JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYS v. STEEDLEY
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRANKLIN v. THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN K FRANKLIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS and SERGEANT TIMOTHY T PIPPIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COBB v. RICHARDSON, et al.
as 4:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
HOMER DOUGLAS COBB, IV
Defendant:
Judge BEN RICHARDSON, DAVID W BUNT and MICHAEL PLEKEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
SIMONDS v. GEORGIA et al
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
STEVE SIMONDS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA and UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA SCHOOL OF LAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODY v. TYSON FOODS INC
as 5:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
TARA WOODY
Defendant:
TYSON FOODS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HOWARD v. MOHR et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
SPRATT HOWARD
Defendant:
MONTY MOHR, WILLIAM C BUSHNELL, JOHN A PURSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
