Cases 21 - 30 of 1,609
SHAH et al v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
VIRAJ SHAH, SATISHKUMAR PATEL, SHIVSENA GAMING LLC and others
Defendant:
GREG COUNTRYMAN, STACEY JACKSON, DAVID COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
MALIK N MARTIN
Defendant:
MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, TAMARTHA LAMBERT, BRANDI MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PASCHAL v. BROWN et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
LINTON BROWN and HOPEWELL BAPTIST CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANYASS v. FBI
as 7:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
IBRAHIM ANYASS
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEESE v. POWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
KADY DEESE
Defendant:
Deputy RYAN POWELL and Corporal ANDREW GUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. RSPS HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Defendant:
RSPS HOLDINGS LLC and SRS MILLEDGEVILLE LLC doing business as SHANE'S RIB SHACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ROSE-BURRELL v. CITY OF MONROE et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
LALLYMAY ROSE-BURREL
Defendant:
CITY OF MONROE, NICHOLAS SILVERBERG and OFFICER RYAN GEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. HATCHER
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BROWN and KELVIN BROWN
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LATRICE HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
