Cases 41 - 50 of 73
FLINT v. BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA
as 4:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
SHAMINIQUE FLINT and HOMER J FLINT
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA , BENJAMIN SCOTT and RUS DREW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
JONES v. GRADY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA IMOGENE JONES
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY GEORGIA and J WILLIAM BASS, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEVES et al v. HURST et al
as 5:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES A REEVES and DENISE Y REEVES
Defendant:
DEBRA K HURST, PAMELA J ROGERS and S FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WAVERLY v. Emory Healthcare Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
FRANCESTA F WAVERLY
Defendant:
Emory Healthcare Inc , OTIS W BRAWLEY , AMELIA ZELNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARSWELL v. MOORE, et al
as 5:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARSWELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J MOORE and Stewart R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
