Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WRIGHT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wright
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, JOHN DOE, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AFRAM-TECH INC et al v. CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
AFRAM-TECH INC, CONSEEDCO INC and WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA, U S DOT, GA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSTELL v. CITY OF CORDELE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv00148
Defendant:
LOUIS NEW, VICE CHAIR JEANIE BARTEE, JUDGE G RUSSELL WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
CRANDALL POSTELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGANS v. KENNEDY et al
as 5:2017cv00379
Defendant:
MEGAN WRIGHT, KAREN WRIGHT and JOHN B KENNEDY
Plaintiff:
RICKY HAGANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS KING et al v. CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
as 4:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HARRIS KING and KEIONA WRIGHT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA , MICHAEL CIELINSKI and TERRI EZELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patel v. Simmons, et al
as 4:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
RAVI PATEL
Defendant:
HERBERT L. SIMMONS and LARRY WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. PRICE et al
as 1:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SAXTON EVANS
Defendant:
GARY PRICE, MAKIBA WRIGHT, BRUMBY MONTAERARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. PRINE et al
as 7:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WRIGHT
Defendant:
CHRIS PRINE, JIMMY ROYALS and DANNY CROFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. WATSON et al
as 4:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
JERALD WATSON, ROBERT AUSTIN, JON MEMMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOPP v. CITY OF GREENSBORO GEORGIA et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
DAVID KOPP
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO GEORGIA and GLENN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
