Cases 1 - 10 of 1,610
PALM v. CORRCARE INC et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PALM
Defendant:
CORRCARE INC, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUMANITARIAN v. BAUN et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
JULIA A BAUN, CANDICE L BROCE, MARGARET CHUPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SMITH v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. MONROE et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHELAINE V DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE MATT MONROE, JUSTO CABRAL, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILSON v. CITY OF ASHBURN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Defendant:
SHIKINA WILSON, CITY OF ASHBURN, ERIC TAYLOR-HAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REDMOND et al v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE REDMOND and JENNIFER THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DUPREE, CHRISTIAN MAKALIN TURNER, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FERGUSON v. MCDONALD'S
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JAMES FERGUSON, JR
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS et al v. BOSWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JALEN BANKS and DONAVAN SANFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS BOSWELL, BOSWELL FARMS ENTERPRISES LLC, BOSWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
