Cases 11 - 20 of 40
LOUIS v. BRAWNER et al
as 5:2019cv00516
Defendant:
RONALD BRAWNER and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LOUIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00041
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Respondent:
TIMOTHY C WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobble v. Cobb County District Attorney et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019mc00017
Defendant:
GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF, Judge Green and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00240
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREGORY C DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00164
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER GREGORY C DOZIER and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ECKERD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2018cv00206
Petitioner:
ANDREW WILLIAM ECKERD
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ECKERD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Petitioner:
ANDREW WILLIAM ECKERD
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GLOCKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ECKERD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Petitioner:
ANDREW WILLIAM ECKERD
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON STATE PRISON and GLOCKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COBBLE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, U S GOVERNMENT and SUMTER COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and U S GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
