Cases 91 - 100 of 2,435
MCKISSIC v. RAWLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Defendant:
C RAWLING, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARNETT v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
RANDY DEWAYNE BARNETT
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON and DOCTOR CARL LIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DENNIS
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JACQUELINE BUNN, DAVID HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
MARK JACKSON and JOCELYN WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, TYRONE OLIVER and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANNESS v. BAILEY
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
BRIAN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. EMMONS
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CHEZ RENALDO REED
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANNESS v. COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
