Cases 51 - 60 of 4,101
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
ALVIN G STANLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, AMIE SMITH, CELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. WHITE et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
BAVARIOUS KEJUAN NELSON
Defendant:
JAYLEN WHITE, MARCUS WILLIAMS, MARIO WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CORNEILUS WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ANTIJUAN HILL
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, LYNN GIBSON, HEATHER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
DARIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHNSON STATE PRISON, Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MCCLESTER et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
CUBA ALASKA MARTIN, III
Defendant:
COI CODY MCCLESTER, Deputy Warden DEXTER MOSES, Warden SCOTT WIZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORSEY v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
FERLANDO DORSEY
Defendant:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. MYERS
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
DARRIN M MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOTEN v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOTEN
Defendant:
ALICIA WARD, MIMS, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and FEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
