Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 71 - 80 of 491
ROMERO v. BAHAMONE
as 1:2020cv00104
Plaintiff: RODRIGO ANDRES ALVAREZ ROMERO
Defendant: MARIA EUGENIA GAJARDO BAHAMONE and MARIA EUGENIA GAJARDO BAHAMONDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOANNOU v. WATKINS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00213
Defendant: VIRNIQUA ROSHAE WATKINS
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER C JOANNOU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POGUE v. WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP LLC
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant: WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC and WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP LLC
Plaintiff: SUSAN POGUE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLORENCE v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
as 4:2020cv00083
Defendant: CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
Plaintiff: PHILIP FLORENCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00050
Defendant: CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, VIVIAN MILLER-CODY, ERIC HOWARD and others
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
HALL v. FINANCIAL DATA SYSTEMS, LLC
as 5:2020cv00112
Plaintiff: ROBERT DONTAY HALL
Defendant: FINANCIAL DATA SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RADFORD v. I C SYSTEMS INC
as 5:2020cv00060
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA RADFORD
Defendant: I C SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOODY v. SYNCHRONY BANK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00061
Defendant: DOES 1-10 and SYNCHRONY BANK
Plaintiff: DIANN L MOODY
HALL v. CONSUMER COLLECTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 5:2020cv00052
Plaintiff: ROBERT DONTAY HALL
Defendant: CONSUMER COLLECTION MANAGEMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DELK v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION LP
as 7:2020cv00012
Defendant: CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION LP and CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION LP doing business as CPA
Plaintiff: BONNIE DELK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?