Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
KENNEDY v. CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA
as 1:2018cv00234
Plaintiff:
LEWIS STEPHEN KENNEDY
Defendant:
CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
ELLISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
RONALD ELLISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, FRANK W BERRY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. STEWART et al
as 5:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M LEWIS
Defendant:
J MICHAEL STEWART , THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA , UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOODWIN et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2018cv00030
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY GEORGIA, OFICER WESLEY ANDREW NEESMITH, OFFICER JAMES HOLLIS and others
Plaintiff:
TOSHA DACON and JOE NATHAN GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LEWIS v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
DEXTER G LEWIS
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HALL v. HALL et al
as 5:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEWIS HALL, JR
Defendant:
SUSAN HALL, CULLEN TALTON and CAROLYN SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
