Cases 41 - 50 of 239
SHAW v. PEACH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv00145
Defendant:
BRANDON WILLIAMS, PEACH COUNTY, KENNY CAMERON and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE RUSSELL SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP PLC, ET AL.
as 7:2021cv00054
Defendant:
INTER-CONTINENTAL HOTELS CORPORATION, INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP RESOURCES LLC, JUBILEE HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. CASON et al
as 7:2021cv00057
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and Officer MARCUS H CASON
Plaintiff:
FRED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS v. CASON et al
as 7:2021cv00052
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and MARCUS H CASON
Plaintiff:
FRED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valencia v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Richardson Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WILLIAMS v. CASON
as 7:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
FRED WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARCUS H CASON and THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMMONS et al v. CITY OF BAINBRIDGE et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Bainbridge Public Safety Department, LADARIC JONES, CHIP WILLIAM NIX and others
Plaintiff:
PETER EMMONS and JOHN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD v. BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY MCDONALD
Defendant:
BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA, CHIP WILLIAM NIX, CITY OF BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALAZAR v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
SALVADOR SALAZAR
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, TORIE TEETS and ATHENS CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
