Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BROWN v. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
BROWN BROWN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRING v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00101
Defendant:
CITY OF THOMASVILLE, TODD MOBLEY, CHERYL PRESHA and others
Plaintiff:
INDANEKWA HERRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRING v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Moses L. Gross, Troy Rich, THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
INDANEKWA HERRING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Head et al v. THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HEAD, CHARLES DENNARD, WILLIE COOPER, SR and others
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURE and THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SEARCY et al v. Ben Hill County School District et al
as 1:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
CARLTON SEARCY and MICHELLE SEARCY
Defendant:
Ben Hill County School District and FLORIDA BIBLE CAMP INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
