Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SHAH et al v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
VIRAJ SHAH, SATISHKUMAR PATEL, SHIVSENA GAMING LLC and others
Defendant:
GREG COUNTRYMAN, STACEY JACKSON, DAVID COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAMILTON v. COMPASS BEHAVIORAL & DEVELOPMENTAL CONSULTANTS LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
DAVYIA HAMILTON
Defendant:
COMPASS BEHAVIORAL & DEVELOPMENTAL CONSULTANTS LLC, AMILA SMITH and RODNEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LAWSON v. WORTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
MISTY LAWSON
Defendant:
WORTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, FRANKLIN PATTERSON, Anthony Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS ALLEGEHNEY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 3:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 7:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
