Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant:
TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MELTON v. CALVERT et al
as 5:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
William Kyle Melton
Defendant:
Justin Calvert, Jake Janovsky, Nathan Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERSHMAN v. OGOUN CORPORATION
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERSHMAN
Defendant:
HIREQUEST DIRECT and OGOUN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GLENN v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GLENN
Defendant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY PROBATION SERVICES OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
