Cases 1 - 10 of 45
REDMOND et al v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE REDMOND and JENNIFER THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DUPREE, CHRISTIAN MAKALIN TURNER, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALLEY v. CITY OF LAGRANGE GEORGIA et al
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar Talley
Defendant:
City of LaGrange, GA, Barbara Price, Roy Olinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAW et al v. GRIFFIN et al
as 7:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
SHEILA SUMMERLIN SHAW and HOYT S SUMMERLIN, JR
Defendant:
TERRY GRIFFIN, JARED CROSBY and ANTHONY BRAHNAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SHAW v. PEACH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv00145
Defendant:
BRANDON WILLIAMS, PEACH COUNTY, KENNY CAMERON and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE RUSSELL SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDENS v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2019cv00141
Defendant:
NATHANIEL HAUGABROOK, GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WAYNE CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GIDDENS v. BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00140
Defendant:
Officer BROWN, Captain TERRY GRIFFIN, BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHEL-WIGGINS v. CITY OF WARNER ROBINS et al
as 5:2019cv00339
Plaintiff:
MIRLANDE DINA MICHEL-WIGGINS
Defendant:
MAYOR RANDY TOMS, STATE OF GEORGIA, CITY OF WARNER ROBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. LANE et al
as 5:2019cv00273
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A LANE and TERRI DAVIS
Plaintiff:
ERICA COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HERRING v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00101
Defendant:
CITY OF THOMASVILLE, TODD MOBLEY, CHERYL PRESHA and others
Plaintiff:
INDANEKWA HERRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
