Cases 171 - 180 of 10,394
MILES v. SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD MILES
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL, MEDSTREET MEDICAL and LEGACY BEHAVIORAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAN v. AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
SALEEBAN ADAN
Defendant:
AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
LT ADRIAN WEST, Deputy Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. EMMONS
as 4:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Vince Martinez Harris
Respondent:
Warden SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. NORTH AMERICAN GOVERNMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, TOOLE WILLIAMS and WARDEN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KELVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. BARNES
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
LT BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEDDINGFIELD v. MORRISON et al
as 7:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
KEITH BEDDINGFIELD, JR
Defendant:
TANGIE MORRISON and NURSE DONNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
