Cases 21 - 30 of 257
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSLEY v. ROGERS STATE PRISON
as 5:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
PAUL E HENSLEY
Defendant:
ROGERS STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TODD v. JARVIS et al
as 7:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
MOUNTAVIUS ISAIAH TODD
Defendant:
J E JARVIS, SOUTHERN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDERS and WADE KRUGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
JAIRUS BERNARD MOORE
Defendant:
BRIAN QWENS, BOARD, CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAYFORD v. JOHN DOES
as 4:2021cv00108
Defendant:
JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
HENRY E RAYFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES et al
as 4:2021cv00117
Petitioner:
JERMAINE E SPENCE
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, EMILY HARISS, BENJAMIN WADE WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. BOZEMAN
as 1:2020cv00219
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE FREEMAN
Defendant:
SHERIFF W E BOZEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. FLOURNOY et al
as 5:2020cv00401
Defendant:
CLERK REBECCA KEATON, JUDGE ROBERT E FLOURNOY, III and DISTRICT ATTORNEY VIC REYNOLDS
Plaintiff:
JERRY W SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PACE v. COLUMBUS GEORGIA, et al.
as 4:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Pace
Defendant:
JULIA SLATER, A L HARDAWAY, C E KINGSLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. COFFEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Respondent:
COFFEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and COFFEE COUNTY MAGISTRATE COURT
Petitioner:
SAMUEL E JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
