Cases 31 - 40 of 356
WOOTEN v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOTEN
Defendant:
ALICIA WARD, MIMS, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and FEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, aGOVERNOR BRIAN P KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. MASSEE
as 5:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN C WIGGINS
Respondent:
BILL MASSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
JUDGE DEBORAH C BENEFIELD, ERMAN TANJUATCO, ROBERT BENTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
HARRISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS HARRISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY JEFFERSON, AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. COLLIER
as 5:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
DELLWAYNE PRICE
Defendant:
CO I C COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2022cv00435
Petitioner:
JAMES C PATTERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. HOLBROOK et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HILL
Respondent:
MELISSA B HOLBROOK, MICHAEL COVENEY, JUDGE LAUREN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
