Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Sharpe v. McNeely
as 7:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Sharpe, Jr
Defendant:
Michelle Lee McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Tomlinson et al
as 7:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Sharpe, Jr
Defendant:
Clayton Tomlinson, Warren L Mixon, Stephen B Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe et al v. Heath et al
as 7:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Sharpe, Jr and Tammy Mechelle Sharpe
Defendant:
Anthony Heath and Antonio Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Helms et al
as 7:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Sharpe, Jr
Defendant:
Kathy Helms, Regina Wilkerson, Elizabeth Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Berrien County District Attorney et al
as 7:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Sharpe, Jr
Defendant:
Berrien County District Attorney, Berrien County Sheriff Office and Officer Luke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steger v. Arnold et al
as 5:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Zuri Deverja Steger
Defendant:
Linda Arnold and Nurse Pam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Rashad Arnold
Defendant:
Alan Adams, David Larry Fraizier, Fred Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant et al v. Perdue et al
as 1:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tarent Bryant, James Peterson, Anthony Stepherson and others
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Karen Handel, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Arnold et al
as 7:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeff Adams
Defendant:
Terry Arnold, Alan Moore, Lachaka Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arnold v. Bowles et al
as 5:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jessie L. Arnold
Defendant:
Theodore Archie Bowles, Houston County Medical Center, Georgia Composite State Board of Medical Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
