Cases 31 - 40 of 43
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and DEPUTY WARDEN JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGREAVES v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Defendant:
GDC COMMISSONER TIMOTHY WARD, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. CARRICK et al
as 5:2021cv00048
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MICHELLE WESTBROOK, JOHN OR JANE DOE, MAJOR DAVID CARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
CORDERA DANTEZE SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John and Jane Doe
as 5:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
NURSE MILLER, Nurse JOHN OR JANE DOE, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Defendant:
DOCTOR SMITH, OFFICER NICHOLAS GIBBS, ALCOVY JUDICIAL SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00486
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, SEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESTER v. DOE et al
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN OR JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MICHAEL TELFAIR and others
Plaintiff:
LEMMIE D LESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERILIEN v. BRYANT et al
as 5:2018cv00239
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, UNIT MANAGER ROZIER, UNIT MANAGER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
