Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Sumler v. DOE et al
as 5:2013cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wesley Lee Sumler
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Pardon and Paroles Board and Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CHAVEIR HUNT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PROBATION, CAROLYN SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. WYNNE et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
KORENTHUS JERMAINE TAYLOR
Defendant:
APRIL M WYNNE, Willie E. Lockette and GEORGIA PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGHTOWER v. FALLIN et al
as 1:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CORNELIUS HIGHTOWER
Defendant:
KALLY FALLIN, Denise Marshall and GEORGIA PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARHAM v. PERRY et al
as 5:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
PHILIP PARHAM
Defendant:
CLINTON PERRY, MALINDA ANDERSON, DALE GARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Treutlen Probation Detention Center
as 5:2011cv00026
Petitioner:
Bruce Horne
Respondent:
Treutlen Probation Detention Center and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00505
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Curry v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00490
Petitioner:
Melvin Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner Probation Director and Bibb County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCrary v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 5:2010cv00470
Plaintiff:
Louis McCrary
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Wilkes Barre Pennsylvania Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
