Cases 41 - 50 of 283
WHITAKER v. JOHN DOES
as 4:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL K WHITAKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2021cv00335
Defendant:
SERGEANT EDWARD FLOYD, CHIEF COUNSELOR MITCHELL, DEPUTY WARDEN IVEY and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES et al v. LONG et al
as 5:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ S GATES, JABBAR PINKSTON and JAHLAND BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL LONG, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PELFREYS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVID HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. NEXTSTAR BROADCASTING INC et al
as 5:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
NEXTSTAR BROADCASTING INC, GATEHOUSE MEDIA GEORGIA HOLDINGS INC, GRAY MEDIA GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURTIS v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
DEOUNTA DEMETRIUS CURTIS
Defendant:
Nurse NEWSOME, Officer DEWBERRY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIARRA v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2021cv00112
Petitioner:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, JUDY FITZGERALD, BATTLE WEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAYFORD v. JOHN DOES
as 4:2021cv00108
Defendant:
JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
HENRY E RAYFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATES v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2021cv00194
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, STATE OF GEORGIA and CORPORATE GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
CASEY ATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CALHOUN STATE PRISON, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
