Cases 1 - 10 of 74
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
JUAN MONTES VARGAS
Defendant:
DR HARRIS and Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. CORECIVIC INC et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
HARRINGTON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC, Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, NANCY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUDHANI v. WASHBURN
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
MAHEMOOD BUDHANI
Defendant:
Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prudent v. WASHBURN et al
as 5:2022cv00231
Petitioner:
ENSI PRUDENT
Respondent:
Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, Act. Dir. ICE Atl. SEAN IRVIN, Director, ICE TAE D JOHNSON and others
BRIGHT v. CADWELL et al
as 5:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
ROY BOONE BRIGHT
Defendant:
DEPUTY OFFICER KIMBERLY CADWELL, DETECTIVE DONNA WILLIAMS, SHERIFF TIM POUNDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
MARK S DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN MYERS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIE MOBLEY, CAPT ZIRKLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. LANIER et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Respondent:
JUDGE HEATHER H LANIER, TRE MCLENDON, RUSSELL WENG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. CALDWELL
as 5:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLOYD RUSSELL
Defendant:
WARDEN CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
