Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, NURSE ARMSTRONG and NURSE ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Defendant:
ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2017cv00319
Petitioner:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SKINNER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
MANASSEH ROYDREGO SKINNER
Defendant:
ROOSEVELT CARTER, Patricia Hunter, LISA JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00019
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armstrong v. Montgerand et al
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Neal Orlando Armstrong
Defendant:
D.A. Brumby D. Montgerand, Robert Howard, Jr., Dan McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Ostrander et al
as 1:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Neal Orlando Armstrong
Defendant:
Ostrander , Stephens , Haggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Goss et al
as 1:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Neal Orlando Armstrong
Defendant:
Stephen S. Goss, Yucca Simpson, D.A. Brumby D. Montgerand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Ramsey et al
as 5:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Derris Bradford, Sr
Defendant:
Calvin Ramsey, Edward H. Burnside, Nurse Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
