Cases 1 - 10 of 25
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BATTLE v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
CHARLES M MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIARRA v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2021cv00112
Petitioner:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, JUDY FITZGERALD, BATTLE WEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00106
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, RALPH SHROPSHIRE and ARON PINEIRO
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERIWETHER v. BATTLE
as 5:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L MERIWETHER
Defendant:
JESSICA BATTLE and AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. DOE
as 5:2018cv00243
Respondent:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERIWETHER v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L MERIWETHER
Defendant:
HOWARD, BATTLE, AYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCON v. BICKHAM et al
as 7:2017cv00147
Defendant:
PHIL BICKHAM, A W SAMPLE, PAULK and others
Plaintiff:
JULIEN MORENA GARCON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
