Cases 1 - 9 of 9
VIRAL v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
PATEL VIRAL
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATEL v. HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 4:2020cv00169
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
PIYUSH KUMAR PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NDONGA v. EMPOWR.COM et al
as 7:2020cv00028
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, EMPOWR.COM and others
Plaintiff:
MBETI VICTORIA NDONGA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLATAN et al v. CLAYTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 7:2019cv00199
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CLAYTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
SPINDY CHARLATAN and MARIE SAINVIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIRKLAND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KIRKLAND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON STATE PRISON, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
SAPEU V. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ET AL
as 5:2013cv00007
Petitioner:
PAUL SAPEU
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS and AHMED HOLT
Hamadneh v. Skinner et al
as 4:2011cv00025
Petitioner:
Nazeer Hamadneh
Respondent:
Felicia Skinner , United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement , Fredrick Madrea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
St. John-Thompson v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00116
Petitioner:
Christopher St. John-Thompson
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Immigration & Customs Enforcement Ditrict Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
