Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HILLMAN v. SELF et al
as 5:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
MARVIN HILLMAN, III
Respondent:
JUDGE TILLMAN E. SELF, JUDGE CONNIE LYNN WILLIFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLIFFORD T WOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
COOPER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD COOPER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, DOCTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD COOPER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00449
Defendant:
WARDEN RONALD BRAWNER, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE, DOCTOR SPEIGITT and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. PEEPLES et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD NEAL, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PEEPLES, LT TRAVIS WRIGHT, MR BARTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00167
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, LT TRAVIS WRIGHT, OFFICER WARD and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD NEAL, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETTE v. SHIRLEY et al
as 5:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CLIFFORD BURNETTE
Defendant:
RANDY SHIRLEY, ANDY MYERS and RIKI WISE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRINGTON v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
LARRY JORDAN and JAMARIO ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRINGTON v. HOOD et al
as 5:2013cv00184
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
HOOD and DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRINGTON v. ROSS et al
as 5:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
ROSS and LARRY JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
