Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
RIDLEY v. DOE et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY, ESTATE OF MATTIE MAE BURCH and ESTATE OF JULIUS CAESAR FIELDS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIELDS v. SMITH
as 5:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FIELDS
Defendant:
WARDEN AIMEE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. HAYES et al
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Nurse WILLIAMS, JANE DOE, CPT JERROMA WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2020cv00354
Defendant:
LISA FOUNTAIN, JAMES DEMETRIUS SMITH, SARAH BARBER and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. BERRY
as 1:2019cv00117
Respondent:
WARDEN BERRY
Petitioner:
TOM FREDRICK FIELDS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. TERRY, et al
as 5:2018cv00435
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY T EDWARDS, DEPUTY ANTHONY TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. BERRY et al
as 1:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FIELDS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN BERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ANTHONY TERRY, STEPHEN FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
