Cases 1 - 10 of 25
BOYD v. GEO GROUP INC RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REEVES et al
as 5:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
DERRICK P TAYLOR
Defendant:
WARDEN ANGELA REEVES and GEO CORPORATION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSIER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE/AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al
as 5:2020cv00308
Defendant:
GLOBAL ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES GROUP INC, MOORE, PAMALA MALCOLM and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R MOSIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GEO CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GEO CORPORATION, RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and J VERNON NEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANE BREWER
Defendant:
FREDRICK J HEAD, THE GEO GROUP INC and COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. HEAD et al
as 5:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
BERNARD ARNOLD, SR
Defendant:
FREDRICK HEAD, THE GEO GROUP INC and RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
ERNEST COOPER
Defendant:
GREGORY DOZIER, THE GEO GROUP INC, FREDRICK HEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. HEAD et al
as 5:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
JAMMIE MAURICE WEST
Defendant:
FREDERICK HEAD and GEO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNER v. GEO RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE CONNER, JR
Defendant:
GEO RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and FREDRICK HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEARY v. THE GEO GROUP INC et al
as 5:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MACKEVIN LEARY
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP INC, FREDRICK J HEAD, DOUGLAS WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
