Cases 1 - 10 of 12
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WHITED v. GAINES et al
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN THOMAS WHITED
Defendant:
GAINES, BLACKSHEAR, FOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIES v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00486
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, SEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. DEAL et al
as 5:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, GREGORY DOZIER, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
ERIC O'BRIEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, PETER EADDIE and CHRISTOPHER LAKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS LAWSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, DON BLAKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
