Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LINDSEY v. MYERS et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RAY LINDSEY
Defendant:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, WARDEN JEFFRIES, WARDEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson
as 1:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PATTERSON v. WILKES
as 5:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAY PATTERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOMAS v. RAY
as 5:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
AMADO BECERRA LOMAS
Respondent:
WARDEN HEATHER RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAMPBELL v. MEEKS et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
LT MEEKS, CAPTAIN MINTON, CO FREIBURGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. WARDEN et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN, Officer WRIGHT and Officer SAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRESLEY v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, LLOYD J SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. ADDISON et al
as 7:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ADDISON, SERGEANT CLARK and SHERIFF RAY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAY RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. US MARSHALS, et al
as 7:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY WHITE, JR
Defendant:
US MARSHALS and LASALLE CORRECTIONS IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
