Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v WARD et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, STAN SHEPHERD, SHAWN EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHERD v. SHAVER
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
RODNEY SHEPHERD, RODNEY SHEPARD and RODNEY G SHEPARD
Respondent:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER and MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv00014
Defendant:
D O DEAN, NURSE SHEPHERD, PHOEBE PUTNEY HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WASHINGTON WHITE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Sheriff Kevin Sproul, et. al.
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP BRYAN HARRIS
Defendant:
Kevin Sproul, Major Lewis, Lance Montgerard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP BRYAN HARRIS
Defendant:
SANFORD BISHOP, JAMEEL GULLEY, Kevin Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
