Cases 1 - 10 of 191
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DENNIS
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JACQUELINE BUNN, DAVID HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLE v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
CHARLES M MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SECKINGER v. BARNARD
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
JAMES SECKINGER
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. BERNARD
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
WILLARD FRANK WHITE
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DEESE
as 5:2022cv00433
Petitioner:
SAMMY LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SHERIFF TERRY DEESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCOVEY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, AARON PINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
