Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KOFFLER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT KOFFLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN BEN FORD, NICHOLAS STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOOLSBY v. JUDKINS et al
as 5:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
JASON RICHARD GOOLSBY
Defendant:
SGT JUDKINS, OFFICER STONE, UNKNOWN OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWELL v. TALTON
as 5:2019cv00361
Defendant:
SHERIFF CULLEN TALTON, JEANIE VAUGHN, CAPTAIN GARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROOKS HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
as 5:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
RODERICK FRANK FOSTER
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE OF, SAMUEL S OLENS, HOWARD Z SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. XANDERS et al
as 5:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SMITH
Defendant:
SAM XANDERS, STATE OF GEORGIA, MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INMAN v. STATE BAR OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L INMAN
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA, WILLIAM P SMITH, III, ROBERT E MCCORMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00347
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, HOWARD Z SIMMS and MARTHA C CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
