Cases 1 - 10 of 10,400
TILLMAN v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MARQUAVION TILLMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SLATON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
MARCUS OCTAVIOUS SLATON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SADLER v. LEE COUNTY JAIL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
BRYAN KEITH SADLER
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY JAIL FACILITY and LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. USA
as 7:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
FERRELL WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CAMPBELL v. LOVE
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
Officer LOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS DIVINCI JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, WARDEN GRACE, CERT OFFICER LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
