Cases 11 - 20 of 117
KENNEDY v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
ERUNTA KENNEDY
Defendant:
WARDEN ANTOINE CALDWELL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRRECTIONS, UNIT MANAGER SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON BELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN ANTINIO CALDWELL, UNIT MANAGER BRAGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDWELL v. MARR
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
TEZE CALDWELL
Defendant:
Deputy JOHN MARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYO v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2022cv00029
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE MAYO
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TIFT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CALDWELL v. UNITED STATES
as 5:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CALDWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
RUSSELL v. CALDWELL
as 5:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLOYD RUSSELL
Defendant:
WARDEN CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
CANTEZE MURPHY
Defendant:
BENNIE CALDWELL, REBECCA STONE, NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Canteze Murphy
Defendant:
BENNIE CALDWELL, Stone Rebecca, Nationwide Insurance Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2021cv00082
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE) and WARDEN ANTOINE CALDWELL
Petitioner:
DAVID JONATHAN KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOWLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, NURSE PRACTITIONER LOMAMI, DEPUTY WARDEN MEADOR and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
