Cases 11 - 20 of 66
MCKINNEY v. ROBERSON et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Officer HARPER, Officer KEISEY, Lieutenant ROBERSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00490
Plaintiff:
DARIUS D SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF COUNSELOR PEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2019cv00477
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, LIEUTENANT MERREL, CHIEF HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. MERRELL et al
as 5:2019cv00449
Defendant:
STATE, DEPUTY WARDEN DAUGHTRY, DOOLY STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUMORRIS HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAVALA v. WARD, et al.
as 5:2019cv00383
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, GENERAL COUNSELOR JON GOODY, DEPUTY WARDEN JOSEPH POLITE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZAVALA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2019cv00073
Defendant:
TODD, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNINGTON v. HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC et al
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC and DONALD RANDOLPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
JAMIE KENNINGTON, JUAN URBINA, JR. and DARREN JASKULSKI
SIMMONS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
TANYA HARPER SIMMONS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00049
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00024
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
