Cases 11 - 20 of 43
POOLE v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES
as 7:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. PAULK et al
as 7:2020cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
Sgt HARDEN, ASHLEY PAULK, Officer NESMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. SHEELY et al
as 7:2020cv00017
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
BRIAN MCCDANIEL, CATHERINE SMITH, ANDREW SEERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. MAXWELL et al
as 4:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
KRISTY LEE MAXWELL, THOMAS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. MAXWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
GEORGE KORNEYY, THOMAS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, KRISTY LEE MAXWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE, JAY FLOWERS, MAX BEVERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
RON JAMES, Officer ROLLINS, PRESTON ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. POOLE et al
as 4:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Doctor EDET BASSEY and Nurse POOLE
Plaintiff:
WILLIE T JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00156
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CLARENCE POOLE
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, CALHOUN STATE PRISON, CHEIF COUNSELOR KENDRICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAMERU v. ACHARYA
as 4:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Govinda Acharya
Plaintiff:
Guenet Tameru
3Rd Party Defendant:
SFCL, LLC, BCS Office Investments One, LP, DOVER BAY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
